» ‘Fingerprints are Usernames, not Passwords’
Dustin Kirkland:
I could see some value, perhaps, in a tablet that I share with my wife, where each of us have our own accounts, with independent configurations, apps, and settings. We could each conveniently identify ourselves by our fingerprint. But biometrics cannot, and absolutely must not, be used to authenticate an identity. For authentication, you need a password or passphrase. Something that can be independently chosen, changed, and rotated.
From a security perspective, he’s absolutely right. If I were designing a corporate security policy, I would not allow TouchID to be used to secure sensitive information (which is why I’ve been kind of surprised to read how TouchID is supposedly a boon for the iPhone in the enterprise).
From a consumer perspective, however, this genie is already out of the bottle. Fortunately, as loose as it is, it’s more secure than what was being used before.
I think his perspective on how private your fingerprints are (“not private at all”) is interesting. Speaking personally, having once had a security clearance and having adopted a child, the government’s already got more copies of my fingerprints than they know what to do with.
» One hand mode
AndroidBeat’s Stefan Constantinescu on the “neat software trick” the Galaxy Note uses when you want to use your phone one-handed:
When you enable a buried option in the one-hand operating menu, you can enable a “tiny screen” mode with a simple swipe gesture. Like Alice in Wonderland, what you see on your Note 3′s display suddenly becomes smaller and you’re effectively using Android as if it were a windowed application on your desktop computer.
Phabletous!
(Via Matthew Panzarino and Sebastiaan de With)
Premium black
On The Talk Show this week I mentioned the black MacBook having been more expensive than its white counterpart and a few people took to Twitter to complain that the black version had better specs. My point was that the black model was more expensive than a similarly configured white model, which you could only get as a Build-To-Order (BTO).
When introduced, the stock high-end white MacBook had 1 GB of RAM, a 120 GB hard drive and a 2.2 GHz processor and it sold for $1299. The stock black model had the same configuration except for the hard drive which was 160 GB and it sold for $1499. I was able to find comments that indicate that if you did a BTO on the high-end white MacBook to get the 160 GB drive, the black MacBook was still $125 more.
That confused me because as I said on The Talk Show I thought the difference was $50. Then I remembered that I bought the second generation black MacBook. The high-end white MacBook and the black MacBook of that release both came with 2 GB of RAM and a 2.4 GHz processor. The black model had a 250 GB hard drive versus a 160 GB drive in the white high-end model. The price points for each were the same as the previous generation. I can’t find evidence of this, but I believe that when you did a BTO on the white high-end model to add the 250 GB drive, it was still $50 cheaper than the black MacBook.
Update: Looks like I was wrong, the premium on the second generation was $100. (Thanks to Josh Stoner.)
» ‘Windows 7 outpacing Windows 8 adoption’
ZDNet’s Zack Whittaker:
Windows 7 generated more growth in share in the past month than Windows 8, amid warnings on continued poor PC sales and a weak “back to school” season during the third quarter.
I suspect Windows 8.1 could turn that around, but… yeeeeeesh. Meanwhile, most iOS users are on iOS 7 now.
» Ads may be coming to Gmail for Android
Android Police’s Artem Russakovskii digs into Google’s code and determines the following:
The most significant under-the-hood and probably not active yet addition to Gmail 4.6 is ads. Yup, ads are most definitely coming to Gmail for Android which managed to stay ad-free all this time, unlike its web counterpart.
His conclusion?
After all, it seems almost silly to not monetize a core app with an absolutely massive install base – between 500 million and a billion.
Exhibit A for people wondering why many of us prefer Apple’s business model.
(Via The Verge)
» ‘Black to the Mac’
Once again I join John Gruber on The Talk Show to discuss Martha Stewart,
» Slight iOS 7 passcode design flaw
Equinux (via Daring Fireball):
In our opinion, the passcode in iOS 7 has a visual security gap: when you enter your passcode, the larger buttons light up a lot longer than with iOS 6.
I don’t see it as being that much worse — they fade out instead of going off on release — but I’d recommend turning off Simple Passcode whether you have TouchID or not. You can still use a 4-character passcode if you want but it’s a lot harder to read from a distance off the full virtual keyboard. (You do have to hit “Done” at the end with the full keyboard, which is an extra tap. Sorry if that kills it for you, lazypants.)
» iOS 7-ified Mac OS
As imagined by Edgar Rios. I don’t usually think much of these concepts because they so often go off the rails, but this one’s pretty restrained. I wouldn’t doubt something like this is coming. Strangely, the desktop looks a little more like Elementary OS‘s desktop.
(Via Khoi Vinh)
» Team Martha
Lodsys sues Martha Stewart, Martha fights back. I’m making an adorable crushed velvet table centerpiece with lilies and sparklers that says “GO, MARTHA!”
» Good luck with that
Kelly Clay writing for Forbes:
According to an inside source at Microsoft, Microsoft Stores will begin giving a minimum $200 in-store credit (as a Windows Store gift card) for iPhones on Friday as part of its “#timetoswitch” campaign, obviously hoping consumers will use the cash to buy a Windows Phone.
On the other hand, I really have no other suggestions for them for improving Windows Phone’s fortunes.
I can’t find evidence of this anymore, but I distinctly remember that in the summer before the Zune came out there were rumors that Microsoft was going to just give people licenses to the songs they’d already bought on iTunes to get them to switch, which Microsoft boosters said the company could do because they were such a money-making dynamo. They didn’t do that, of course, at the very least because it would be technically unfeasible if not monetarily unfeasible.
Even if they had, though, there are some problems you can’t just buy your way out of. The problem isn’t getting the iPhone out of customers hands, it’s giving them a compelling reason to pick up a Windows Phone.